This pattern of deception and deceit rivals the Nixon Administration and, as former Nixon White House counsel John Dean points out, launching a country into war based on fabrications would make Watergate "pale by comparison.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
First of all, the US claimed that Iraq have weapons of mass destruction that could be captured and used by terrorists organizations and would pose a menace to the United States.
Secondly, the US argued that the Iraqi regime was a vicious and cruel regime that oppressed its own citizens, and only war could guarantee a new democratic state that could spread democracy out to other Middle Eastern countries. Eventually, the US declared war against Iraq on 20 March, and that has led to hundreds of causalities.
In fact, the main reason why Us war against iraq essay US invaded Iraq was to secure its political and economical dominance in the region. In that context, whether the US-led war in Iraq can be justifiable or not can be explained by the Just War Theory of jus ad bellum.
Just War Theory argues that if a war is justifiable, it should fulfill all of these six criteria of the jus ad bellum. However, the US-led war Us war against iraq essay Iraq cannot be justifiable since it contradicts with the Six Criteria for a just war.
Initially, the US recent war in Iraq was not based on a just cause as the US main purpose was to protect its economic and political interests in the region.
Moreover, the decision process of the US-led war in Iraq is not based on a Proper Authority and Public Declaration as it did not reflect the will of people and parliament.
Furthermore, declaring war in Iraq was not a Last Resort for the US, since it could apply soft power politics through economic and political sanctions. Additionally, the US-led war in Iraq did not have a Probability of the Success, as it led to causalities of many people.
Eventually, the US-led war in Iraq did not have acceptable reasons, and it was not based on the principle of the proportional benefits that bring benefits to the majority of the people. Thus, in this paper I will argue that the US did not have acceptable reasons to declare war in the US recent war in Iraq in accordance with the Six Criteria for a jus ad bellum, which is a right to declare war.
In fact, states can declare war to each other only for the acceptable reason Orend, War, page 6. The just reason generally takes place in the case of the self-defense and guard for the protection of the innocent civilians form the probable atrocious and dreadful regimes and groups. It means that just war can only takes place where a country encounters with the infringement of its citizens basic rights and freedom, which means that it should not be done for the sake of any other purposes or goods.
In this framework, Gowan, Cooperation and Conflict, page argues that although the real reasons why the US declared war against Iraq were that to disseminate the principle of the democracy in the Middle East, to assist the Iraqi people to topple an tyrannical regime, and to remove Saddam Hussein as he produced the weapon of mass destruction and advocated international terrorist groups that posed a threat to world peace and security, the main reason was to preserve its economic and political dominance by securing control and dominance over the main oil resource in the region.
Indeed, a country must have morally justifiable intention to declare war against another country Orend, War, page 6. In addition to the right cause, the actual impetus driving a country to declare war against another country should be morally convenient. It means that the reason behind a country to declare war against a country should not based on the irrational and non-ethical motives, including retribution or ethnic animosity.
Indeed, a state should have that criteria in order to gain legitimacy and legality to wage war against other countries. In other words, there had been splits and disunity between the US and EU member states to pass resolution regarding how to remove Saddam threat.
This disunity and discrepancy put in question the legitimacy of the US-led war in Iraq. Moreover, Gowan Cooperation and Conflict, page states that during the US-led war in Iraq, the US did not take the consent of the assembly and the United National Security Council to pass a resolution to declare war, which means that the legitimacy and legality of the US-led war in Iraq is questionable, since it did not reflect the consent of the people and parliament.
Therefore, it can be said that the US-led war in Iraq cannot be explained in terms of the Just War Theory, as it contradicted with the criteria of proper authority and public declaration. Indeed, a state can resort to war only if it did not have any peaceful alternative ways, such as diplomatic and economic ways, to resolve the dispute in question, as war should be the least preferred course of action in accordance with the Just War Theory Orend, War, page 7.
According to this criteria, a state should firstly use economic, social and political ways to eliminate the probable war. And if that states failed in these way, finally that states can resort to war as a last practical and rational way.
In we apply the principle of the last resort to the US-led war in Iraq, it can be said that the US-led war in Iraq is not justifiable, since the US firstly resorted to declaring war rather than resorting to the economic, social, and political sanctions approved by the United National Security Council Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, page According to the criteria of probability of success, a country should not resort to war if it forecasts that resorting war will bring about the indeterminate result the on the circumstance Orend, War, page 7.
Here, the main aim is to hamper the violence that will ineffective. As for the US-led war in Iraq, it can be said that it contradicted with the probability of success, since it eventuated in the causalities and fatalities of numerous people that was regarded as fiasco for the US.
Indeed, the recent invasion of Iraq by the US resulted with the human and material costs and has not brought about any change in the Iraq and the Iraqi people.
According to Boley War on Iraq, page 41numerous people, both civilians and soldiers, has killed and have become refuges as result of the war that have long-term imprints on the Iraqi people and region.
It means that the US-led war in Iraq was eventuated in the failure. Thus, in terms of the probability of accomplish, it can be said that American invasion of Iraq cannot be justifiable for the just war as it was resulted with the fiasco that led shadowy results for the Iraqi people.
Indeed, a state should take universal goods into consideration before declaring war Orend, War, page 7. However, in the case of the US-led war in Iraq, it can be regarded that it was declared just for the interests of the US, not for the sake of the Iraqi people.
In other words, it was declared just to secure American political and economical hegemony in the region, since there were no positive sum game in which all parties will gain advantage. In conclusion, it can be argued that the attacks on the US on September 11 provided an additional incentive to the US administration to augment its hegemony and power over the Middle East.
In fact, the ambition of gaining the control of the Middle East region and its strategic resources, mainly oil, was regarded to be a significant driving impetus behind the US administration to wage the war against Iraq.The War In Iraq I conducted five interviews on five different age groups and asked them all the same five questions.
I feel like asking the same questions would give me a better understanding as to how they all felt similar or how they all felt different. Iraq Invasion of Kuwait vs U.S Iraq War Iraq and Kuwait have a long history; Kuwait played a huge part in the Iran-Iraq war, mostly financially.
Open warfare began on September 22, ; Iraq claimed Iran shelled a number of border posts on September 4, This article first appeared on the American Enterprise Institute site. Yesterday I laid out my rationale for advocating a more confrontational American policy toward Iran. Today I want to provide.
French soldiers from the Foreign Legion Infantry regiment in the Saudi desert near Hafr al-Batin, wear full chemical warfare equipment during a training session during the Gulf War on October Crimes of War—Iraq provides a comprehensive legal, historical, and psychological exploration of the war in Iraq from the same editorial team whose Crimes of War was a landmark book about Vietnam and the revelation of American war crimes.
Our website is the source for the latest security and strategic research from the military's link to the academic community. The Strategic Studies Institute is the War .