Ethical issues in hofling study

Basically the participants were playing the role that they thought was expected of either a prisoner or prison guard.

Ethical issues in hofling study

From the time immediately after World War II until the early s, there was a gradually developing consensus about the key ethical principles that should underlie the research endeavor.

Two marker events stand out among many others as symbolic of this consensus. The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial following World War II brought to public view the ways German scientists had used captive human subjects as subjects in oftentimes gruesome experiments.

In the s and s, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study involved the withholding of known effective treatment for syphilis from African-American participants who were infected.

Events like these forced the reexamination of ethical standards and the gradual development of a consensus that potential human subjects needed to be protected from being used as 'guinea pigs' in scientific research. By the s, Ethical issues in hofling study dynamics of the situation changed.

Cancer patients and persons with AIDS fought publicly with the medical research establishment about the long time needed to get approval for and complete research into potential cures for fatal diseases. In many cases, it is the ethical assumptions of the previous thirty years that drive this 'go-slow' mentality.

After all, we would rather risk denying treatment for a while until we achieve enough confidence in a treatment, rather than run the risk of harming innocent people as in the Nuremberg and Tuskegee events. But now, those who were threatened with fatal illness were saying to the research establishment that they wanted to be test subjects, even under experimental conditions of considerable risk.

You had several very vocal and articulate patient groups who wanted to be experimented on coming up against an ethical review system that was designed to protect them from being experimented on.

Although the last few years in the ethics of research have been tumultuous ones, it is beginning to appear that a new consensus is evolving that involves the stakeholder groups most affected by a problem participating more actively in the formulation of guidelines for research.

While it's not entirely clear, at present, what the new consensus will be, it is almost certain that it will not fall at either extreme: Ethical Issues There are a number of key phrases that describe the system of ethical protections that the contemporary social and medical research establishment have created to try to protect better the rights of their research participants.

The principle of voluntary participation requires that people not be coerced into participating in research. This is especially relevant where researchers had previously relied on 'captive audiences' for their subjects -- prisons, universities, and places like that.

Closely related to the notion of voluntary participation is the requirement of informed consent. Essentially, this means that prospective research participants must be fully informed about the procedures and risks involved in research and must give their consent to participate.

Ethical standards also require that researchers not put participants in a situation where they might be at risk of harm as a result of their participation. Harm can be defined as both physical and psychological.

There are two standards that are applied in order to help protect the privacy of research participants. Almost all research guarantees the participants confidentiality -- they are assured that identifying information will not be made available to anyone who is not directly involved in the study.

The stricter standard is the principle of anonymity which essentially means that the participant will remain anonymous throughout the study -- even to the researchers themselves.

Clearly, the anonymity standard is a stronger guarantee of privacy, but it is sometimes difficult to accomplish, especially in situations where participants have to be measured at multiple time points e.

Increasingly, researchers have had to deal with the ethical issue of a person's right to service. Good research practice often requires the use of a no-treatment control group -- a group of participants who do not get the treatment or program that is being studied.

But when that treatment or program may have beneficial effects, persons assigned to the no-treatment control may feel their rights to equal access to services are being curtailed. Even when clear ethical standards and principles exist, there will be times when the need to do accurate research runs up against the rights of potential participants.COCA-COLA COMPANY Addressing ethical issues in Coca Cola Introduction Description of co.

and the issue Coca-Cola is the largest company that sells beverages internationally and it operates the biggest distribution system worldwide.

Coca cola has strong product diversification (Pendergrass,,24).

Ethical issues in hofling study

Coca-Cola Company is the most valuable and visible brand companies in the world. Hofling et al study evaluation essay. Hofling et al study evaluation essay; Leave a comment; Fight club adaptation analysis essay courtney falk essay problem solution analysis essay maakt geld gelukkig essay writer the dust bowl research paper lucy lippard essays on friendship tone of an essay pirmin schwander dissertation proposal.

Ethics in Research and Publication - This website is a comprehensive set of resources that are helpful in learning examining and learning about ethical issues in research.

The site contains webcasts, PDFs, examples, links to other sites and numerous other resources. Although there are some ethical issues with certain aspects of the Hofling experiment i believe that i would allow the experiment to be repeated today. The ethical issues surrounding the experiment is very simple.

It is all about the psychological effects the test could have on the unsuspecting subjects.

Hofling's Hospital Experiment of Obedience | Simply Psychology

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN RESEARCH 4 Included in the summary are issues raised by the HHS regarding the IRB requirements in their “Guidelines for Use of Humans the proposed study ethical in terms of respecting the participants’ welfare and dignity and. Hofling et Al () Hofling's study of obedience.

Aim Hofling () created a more realistic study of obedience than Milgram’s by carrying out field studies on nurses who were unaware that they were involved in an experiment.

However, there are numerous faults with the experiment in terms of ethical issues. The main issue is that the.

Keith E Rice - Hofling & His Nurses