The court ruled in favor of Sawyer despite evidence presented by his ex-wife that alleged he had sexually abused their child. Three years earlier, Daniel returned from a visit with his father with suspicious bruises on his bottom.
Legislature Committee Professor John H. I specialize in trust, estate, and probate law. I have taught, written, and served as a legislative drafter in the probate field for more than three decades.
For the Uniform Law Commission, I was the reporter and principal drafter of the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which governs fiduciary investing in Connecticut and most other states. Wills and Other Donative Transfers Vol. Try not to die in Connecticut. If you are a person of means, you should--late in life--establish your domicile in some place such as Florida or Maine or Arizona that has a responsible probate system.
You can still own a Connecticut home and spend plenty of time here. Indeed, if you place title to your Connecticut home in a Florida trust, your trustee can even transfer the house after your death without going through Connecticut probate. I am not the only person who gives such advice.
Some of these people would leave even if they did not fear Connecticut probate, in order to escape our state income tax and our winter weather. By encouraging these people to leave our state, Connecticut probate causes the state to lose the income tax and other tax revenue that goes where they go.
Connecticut probate is a national scandal. Our bad reputation is long standing. More than 50 years ago, inProfessor Thomas Atkinson of NYU, then the leading American authority on the field, wrote that "Connecticut is just about at the bottom of the list so far as its probate court system is concerned.
I move in national trust and estate circles, where Connecticut probate is routinely discussed as a disgrace. For estate planning professionals and law professors, Connecticut is the poster child for how not to organize probate courts. The Five Core Failings There are five major and deeply interconnected structural flaws in Connecticut probate: I will discuss each.
Waste Connecticut has separate probate courts, with probate judges, separate offices, separate budgets, separate staffs. A few of the courts operate full time, most do not.
Some in fact operate only a few hours a week, although the judges and the staffs obtain such perks of full-time employment as full health insurance. Maintaining these courts and staffs is hugely wasteful, especially the many that sit idle much of the week.
Nobody has done a careful study of how many probate courts our state really needs, but my starting estimate is about one-tenth the number we have.
A dozen courts rather than ten dozen, staffed with professional judges and operating full time, would do a far better job at a fraction of the cost.
Connecticut probate is horribly expensive. Filing fees and subsequent charges are far higher than elsewhere. Recently, the probate courts extended their fees to nonprobate transfers such as life insurance and joint tenancy, for which, by definition, no probate services are needed.
The reason our citizens suffer these voracious fees is quite simple: Our citizens are being made to feed ten times more probate courts and probate judges than they need. Amateur Judges Connecticut law does not require probate judges to be legally trained, even though probate judges make legal decisions that affect the property and liberty of our citizens.
These judges decide who owns the property of a decedent, they decide whether to strip a citizen of his or her liberty by declaring the citizen incompetent. Such powers ought not to be in the hands of persons who lack legal training.
Indeed, it is far from clear that Connecticut probate could withstand constitutional scrutiny on this ground under the Due Process clause of the U.
When liberty and property are at stake, the state has an obligation to operate under procedures commensurate with the seriousness of the affected interests. It is the source of the Duplicate Trial rule, that is, the rule that allows appeal de novo to the Superior Court.
In this way, Connecticut allows a litigant who is determined to have a contested probate matter heard by a professional judge to do so, but only after making that person pay for two full trials.
Part-Time Judges Fortunately, many of our probate judges are legally trained. Unfortunately, most of those are part-timers who practice law when they are not serving as judges.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal plombier-nemours.com RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering and allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes they.
That’s how they do. The same thing happened to me. Mine withdrew saying I was “uncooperative” because I wanted him to fight harder to protect my interests. The Hillary Clinton Scandals - Hillary Clinton has been involved in numerous scandals.
These are related to Wikileaks, Benghazi, campaign donations, health care, Iraq, Iran, and Zionism.
it’s unconstitutional for cps to conduct an investigation and interview a child on private property without exigent circumstances or probable cause.
The Worst Interests of the Child: The Trafficking of Children and Parents Through U.S. Family Courts [Keith Harmon Snow] on plombier-nemours.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
“Keith Harmon Snow’s meticulously documented investigation into sex-trafficking of children by American judges is not to be missed. This scandal is one of the most important censored stories in our country today. There are some truths that I strive to preach, for lack of a better word, in today's information-culture wars propagated in our corrupt mainstream media.