Picture taken in Source Why Teach Moral Values When most persons talk about a school curriculum, they think about math, science, social studies, and language courses. Seldom do I hear or read about moral values as being part of the curriculum. The problem is that the neglect of teaching moral values in schools is hurting our students and causing problems in society.
This definition, by itself, tells us nothing about the standard by which we establish or measure right and wrong.
The centuries have seen many different approaches to ethics; none seem to be satisfactory. The terms 'ethics', and even more so, 'morality' carry heavy emotional baggage. Traditional approaches to morality are confused and contradictory.
While supposedly telling us what is 'right' or 'good' for us, they variously imply sacrificing our lives to some Greater Good, restrict beneficial sexual conduct, oppose our legitimate desire for personal happiness or offer supposedly ideal, but impractical solutions.
I consider these views to be distortions of what ethics really has to offer - given a rational approach. Ethics should and can give real and practical guidance to our lives - our best rational interests - without sacrificing others.
The system that I'm proposing is a workable personal guide to acquiring virtues that promote optimal living, both for the individual and, by extension, for society. It is designed for self-motivated individuals who seek a rational system of principles that will help them both define and achieve ever improving character and living.
A system that we can enthusiastically pursue, not from duty or primarily to please others, but for personal benefit and from personal conviction.
Why do we need Ethics? Morality is often used by various leaders and organizations to control society - sometimes benevolently, but usually bringing about self-sacrifice and human suffering.
There are, however, far more fundamental and legitimate reasons for ethics: To provide purpose and meaning to our lives by helping to define goals in our lives - and then to help guide us to achieve them.
Choices The most basic need for ethics lies in the fact that we do not automatically know what will benefit our lives, and what will be detrimental. We constantly face choices that effect the length and quality of our lives. We must choose our values: We must choose what to think about, and how to go about achieving our goals.
Which character traits to acquire, and which to eliminate. Which of our emotional responses are beneficial, and which detrimental. By what criteria to judge others, and on what basis to interact with them.
We must pro-actively think about these issues and deliberately direct our lives. To the extent that we default on this, to that extent we are at the mercy of social and emotional factors that may be far from optimal - a drifting boat, at the mercy of the currents and winds.
Ethics is about the choices that we make - or fail to make. We are aware of our conscious thoughts and of our ability to make informed, intelligent choices - that is what we call free will 1.
We are aware that the choices that we make have consequences, both for ourselves and for others. We are aware of the responsibility that we have for our actions.
But, we do not have reliable inherent knowledge or instincts that will automatically promote our survival and flourishing. We may have an inherent emotional desire to survive and avoid pain, but we do not have innate knowledge about how to achieve those objectives.
A rational, non-contradictory ethic can help us make better choices regarding our lives and well-being. Issues not subject to our choice - unknown to us or outside of our control - are not moral issues. Most moral systems concern themselves primarily with social interactions - what effect do my actions have on others.
This puts the cart before the horse.Immoral Ethics Redefined: Tess of D’Urbervilles and The French Lieutenant’s Woman International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) Page | 51 According to a critic, Hardy in developing these themes, does not so much expound ethical.
A theory is a structured set of statements used to explain (or predict) a set of facts or concepts.Ý A moral theory, then, explains why a certain action is wrong -- or why we ought to act in certain ways.ÝÝ In short, it is a theory of how we determine right and wrong conduct.Ý Also, moral theories provide the framework upon which we think and discuss in a reasoned way, and so evaluate, specific moral issues.
The word “tolerance” has even been more sharply redefined. For years it meant I value you and your opinion to which you are entitled but I disagree with it. That is . Morals describe what is right and wrong, whereas values explain important behaviour and beliefs of a person or group. Morals are then based on the belief and understanding of those values.
Values are set on a group's beliefs. The word "evaluate" explains how values are surmised. People evaluate. "Morality rests on the givenness of values and disvalues and exists in our freedom and power to work for or against their realisation through what we do or not do.
The use of Morality as a value in LD (plombier-nemours.com) submitted 5 years ago by Wallam So this is an issue I've seen come up a couple times on the subreddit, most recently in CakEBall's comment in the recent thread about LD value criterions.